advertiser content
advertiser content
To The Editor,

It is not surprising that the Editor does not know what is on PBS and NPR. You would have to be willing to want to learn something to turn on the channel.

The beginning of public television started with government support to provide quality programming without the intrusion of advertising dollars interfering with the content. The agreement was that PBS would be prohibited in selling commercial advertising and to provide programming to remote areas that were not receiving commercial stations. This was the deal that was struck. The stations raise money through memberships, corporate, nonprofit, and individual support. Several years ago, the government allowed PBS to sell advertising but that advertising is only allowed at the beginning and end of programs. As a regular viewer of PBS & listener of NPR, I as well as many others, appreciate not watching 5 minutes of programming followed by 6-7 minutes of ads. Despite what you think, there are areas in the remote west where access to TV stations is limited. Public broadcasting provides those areas with information critical in times of disasters.

I am one of the millions who do watch PBS. Depending on what programs are airing, there are times when my entire evening will stay on the PBS station. The vast array of options provides quality programming and laughs. The British comedies are some of my favorites. Who can resist Mrs. Bucket, (that is pronounced Bouquet) and her continual plans to impress her neighbors. Or the wacky characters on The Vicar of Dibley, As Time Goes By, or Last of the Summer Wine. My all-time favorite laugh came from Vicar of Dibley when during the marriage ceremony of the really wacky couple, a woman busts through the door and yells, "Stop this wedding. The groom is my husband." The groom turns around and the woman totally embarrassed says, "Sorry, wrong church." The bride has to be scooped up from the floor from fainting, as the congregation looks stunned. It was hilarious.

But there is a lot more to PBS, excellent documentaries, drama, music and more. If you are not a regular view of PBS then you are missing a lot. Here is a list of just a few of the options, all without the annoying advertising breaks for things you do not need or want.

PBS' programming includes:

PBS News Hour- an hour-long news program much the same as the network's daily news programs, Investigation journalism Frontline-an awarding program that provides in depth information on a variety of topics, Washington Week in Review, Iowa PressAmerican Experience-documentary of topics important to American history including, Eyes on the Prize-multi episodes detailing the fight for Civil Rights, The Building of the Brooklyn Bridge, The Dust Bowl, Woodstock, Chasing the Moon and many, many more,

Ken Burns Collection including the award-winning Civil War, World War II, Vietnam War, Baseball, American Revolution, Benjamin Franklin, Country Music, Prohibition, Jackie Robinson, The Statue of Liberty, The Roosevelts, Muhammed Ali, Thomas Jefferson, National Parks, Jazz to name few.

Science: Nova, Nature, Walking with Dinosaurs

Drama: Masterpiece Theatre, Downton Abbey, Upstairs/Downstairs, Poldark, Grantchester, All Creatures Great & Small, Doc Martin, Call the Midwife, 6-part Pride and Prejudice with Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy, Broadchurch and many more.

Finding Your Roots-Genealogy research on notable people, Antiques Roadshow, Austin City Lights, American Masters, Father Brown, Great Performances, original French Chef Julia Child, variety of other food shows, Midsomer Murders

Programming on various programs about Iowa and our people

Children's programming

Sesame Street, Wild Katts, The Odd Squad, original Mister Roger's Neighborhood, Arthur, Curious George, The Magic School bus, and many, many, more.

Rosemary Schwartz

Next Opinion Article
Cracker Barrel is for Triple Trumpers

Previous Opinion Article
Wait, wait..Don't tell me...

Comments

Submit a Comment

Please refresh the page to leave Comment.

Still seeing this message? Press Ctrl + F5 to do a "Hard Refresh".

DC August 19, 2025, 8:57 am Taxpayers should not have to fund this arm of the left. How upset would you be if PBS was an arm of the right and their funding was taken away.

Start a Go Fund Me.

Later

Dave
GB August 19, 2025, 9:01 am Apparently some of us have nothing else to do except rant and whine with endless posts. I think most Americans would agree that while our country is trillions and trillions in debt, spending a billion dollars a year on this stuff is ridiculous! I fail to understand why the American tax payer should have to fund this stuff.
RS August 19, 2025, 12:05 pm Dave & Gerald,
See responses on Valeries rant. Thank you PJ and others for highlighting what PBs has to offer Iowans. That negative comments come from the low-information people who can't see beyond there little lives and shudder at the prospect of the value to learn about that big world out there. They are afraid if they expose themselves to knowledge they might find new things that flies in the face of their small little lives. To the naysayers knowledge is something to avoid. Rosemary
DL August 19, 2025, 2:16 pm DC & GB, The bill that created PBS and NPR was signed into law by Richard Nixon. Remember him? The crook that was forced to resign, because he violated our Constitution in his attempts to cover up a crime committed by his campaign. It was that forced resigning, that started the simmering of the two party democracy, that would take until 2009 to start boiling over. Nixon also signed the bill that created the EPA. An organization created for all Americans, so we could be sure we had safe drinking water. For either one of you to make the comments that you did, after reading the information in the letter, would seem baffling, if it weren't for us watching the pot boil over, in the last 10 years. The undereducated among us finds something that benefits Americans, from sea to shining sea, and decides that it's not worth it, simply because the 'blue people' are in favor of it. No logical reasoning is used. Just the fact that the 'other people' were in favor.
KH August 19, 2025, 3:25 pm Keep doing your thing, and don't let the trolls get you down, Rosemary. They've never had an original thought in their lives. They're people of the land, you see. The common clay of the New West. You know... Morons.
AS August 19, 2025, 3:35 pm When the shows on PBS are balanced politically and not all Democratic policy then they can be funded.
JS August 19, 2025, 4:21 pm The argument should be about government funding
The gov. has a spending problem not a revenue problem. There are many items funded that need a reviewed that we can no longer afford.







nded
GB August 19, 2025, 4:24 pm More Bla Bla Bla ⬆️
LD August 19, 2025, 10:49 pm Thank you Rosemary for your well-written and informative letter!

At the same time, I agree that our budget needs to cut spending and increase revenue. Maybe we could start by taxing the ultra-wealthy at a higher rate. Wasn't "trickle down" economics debunked a long time ago, as well as over and over. Republicans: Come up with something new! Then maybe those that lean left will start listening.
GB August 20, 2025, 6:41 pm DL, you mean like the Crook leading the Biden Crime Family that should have been under Federal Indictment but wouldn't be because he was too feeble??? That Crook???
Big difference between you and I. I would never defend Nixon. You would go to your grave defending Biden, Obama and Crooked Hillary. We are not the same, thank God! Seems to me that you're party is stuffed full of crooks that should be in a Federal Prison.. Some just may get there..
advertiser content advertiser content advertiser content
advertiser content