The other night Dean asks, “Hey, ya wanna go out to hear Donald Trump in Cedar Rapids?”

I'm not sure if that would be the worst date night ever, even compared to the time he asked where I wanted to go...and like an idiot I said, "I don't care." He had no idea WHY I was not happy to roam the aisles of that grocery store we ended up in...

But anyway, being a registered Republican, and feeling like it is expected to support "our" guy, it was a given.

Before Dean gets to the highway,  I ask, “Do you have the tickets?”

I've learned over the years, you have got to ask that.

So it was a night of politics. 

As usual, we paid close attention to what was said.

There was plenty discussion about the Republican party, and a lot of scaring the listeners about the “other side” and how terrible wicked they are, and how great we are.

There was talk of immigration and talk of building a wall...and the usual thoughts on that.

A LOT of discussion about how wonderful our candidate is and how there's a YUGE difference between the two candidates.

I mean after all, one is a man and one is a woman.

One has a paid hairdresser and the other needs one.

For the very first time in my voting life, I am dreading this election.

My first vote for a presidential candidate was for Ronald Reagan.

I have compared every candidate to him since then.

Lately it's gotten harder and harder to see any resemblance to Reagan.

Politicians have figured out that if you want to get the voters, you have got to be Reaganesque you have to either quote him or get a former Reagan appointee.

So of course, I wasn't surprised to see the Reagan appointee.

It also helps to find people that voted for the “other side” but are now on “your side” to speak, as was the case.

Then because we have chosen to bash our police officers lately, you have to include those that have lost their sons and husbands in the line of duty, then just to make sure, let's bring in an officer to speak.

You have to have the family member to introduce the candidate, it seems like the daughter is the preferred speaker tonight with stories of great parenting and grandparenting. Now granted, if you are like I am, you prefer to hear the daughter speak over the screaming and yelling from the candidates lately, well, from the beginning actually.

We heard about how they spent time with their parent, and how they thought of that when she held her new son.

She talked about how she grew up and had everything a kid needed, a roof over her head, food to eat, and you could see dad looking on and smiling with pride, just busting his buttons.

She talked about her public service, and how they are trying to figure out how to help moms that aren't as fortunate.

It finally concluded with the introduction of the much awaited for parent.

As the candidate approached the podium, there was a long, drawn out applause.

Still a few in the crowd were not happy that “their” guy lost, but over all, the majority had joined behind the winner.

As expected, the current president was mentioned.

Walls, economy, religion, defeating terrorism, entrepreneurs, values were all discussed.

Signs in the crowd included of course the usual red, white and blue with the candidates name, even signs that had taken a Hillary sign where they colored it in to say, “Liar”. Of course, at appropriate times there were chants of “Liar”. That one kinda surprised me.

There was flag waving, people crying. (I never got that, I looked at them like, “Really?” it's just a person that you don't really know.) Then again maybe they're thinking like the rest of the country, "Really, all of the people in our country and this is who we chose, yeah us."

There was talk about how we'll all work together.

Republicans, Democrats, yeah, yeah we've heard that so many times. There was talk of how deals were made in the past and how they can make those deals again. How these will be good deals.

Talk about how things will be better for the little guy.

How they'll create jobs.

There is nothing like someone who has more money than you will probably make in your whole life, telling you about how they understand.

I just love how they tell us that the other party doesn't care about us, because only they do.

Yada, yada, yada.

I've heard it all before.

At this point I'm ready to just get up and stretch my legs. I've heard this whole speech before.

Tell me more about the middle class, it's so long since you've been there that you have no idea what that even means.

Of course, there's an appeal for voters from both parties.

There's the whole minimum wage discussion, that it's wrong to think someone working at minimum wage should be in the low income bracket, although middle class means less than $250,000 to them, hey, I'd settle for even half in my middle class pocket.

There was the usual talk about how there would be trade deals, good deals. How they love the steel workers, and manufacturers in this country.

Then how the banks were bad for not giving loans to small businesses.

There was talk about how companies ship jobs overseas, and we are going to make them pay.

There were assurances that we know how to make deals, and they'll be good deals, about how these companies will pay when they ship jobs overseas.

We heard about the Make America Great Again hats, and all the other things Trump puts out.

We heard how we should of course work with our allies and care for our veterans.

And we have to take care of Israel, and their security, and how Russia is bad.

We are going to take out ISIS.

Our commander in chief will be making decisions about our military and their safety.

They aren't going to take away your guns or appeal the second amendment. They talked about gun violence against police officers.

All of the same old, same old.

About this time, Dean walked in the door, fresh off his trip to see Trump, and I was finishing up with Hillary's speech -- the one in which she quoted Ronald Reagan: America is great, because America is good.

So really, folks, if you read this thinking what you read above was from a Trump speech, you've proven what I have believed all along, that these two will say whatever they need to to get your vote.

They really are, for the most part, idealogically the same.

Sure, she's smoother, she oughta be, she's been at this for so long. He has no filter when he talks. She's learned how to be diplomatic in front of a microphone, he has yet to figure out who the diplomats are.

Shoot, he has sent her money before, and probably would again if he wasn't running against her...

Now in attitude and dealing with others, they aren't the same. Well, now that I think about it, maybe they are.

Anyway, here's to making America Great Again...Together...one tweet or one email at a time, you pick.

Comments

Submit a Comment

Please refresh the page to leave Comment.

Still seeing this message? Press Ctrl + F5 to do a "Hard Refresh".

DC August 18, 2016, 11:25 am I would say that the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence were actually old sages and very experienced. According to Google in 1776 the average life expectancy was 35 years. And, I would also venture to say, none of them lived in their parents house/basement until they were 25 to 30 years old as is happening today. Forbes magazine says 31 percent of 18 to 34 year olds are living with their parents. Please spare me the argument of there are no jobs for them in the workforce. Look around, help wanted signs are everywhere. Some of these folks just think they are just too good to start at the bottom. I don\'t want this 31% of the population driving the train of my Country down the tracks.

Later
Dave
TL August 11, 2016, 12:21 pm Rosemary,

Yes, I\'m getting pretty creaky in my old age. I have always been proud of my signature on the Declaration of Independence. Most people thought I was lost at sea. haha.

I understood your point. Your post, for me, also raised the increasing, intractable, young vs. old (liberal vs. conservative) issue going on in this country, affecting all branches of government.

This current view point, that the old (conservative) citizens should get out of the way for the young (liberal) citizens is troublesome.

These young citizens, clambering for “their” point of view, will not all remain liberal throughout their life. As they age, they MAY become conservative. The decisions they are fighting for now may not be in their best interests always.

If we allow the Supreme court to become a 7-2 or even 8-1 majority, it will affect many issues for decades to come. And given these overwhelming majority decisions, setting precedents that may never be overcome.

The Supreme court has become so politicized. It\'s now easy to predict just how each justice will opine on a given political issue. That is not how the SCOTUS should operate…no matter which party is in the majority.

Imagine (in your dreams, Rosemary) that the SCOTUS is a huge Dem. majority and the Senate is in the hands of the Democrat party, the House is eventually turned over to the Dems. and the POTUS is forever in the hands of a Democrat (given the electoral map, already a large Democrat headstart).

I know to you that sounds like Utopia. But HALF this country has other ideas and they would then have no voice.

I know everyone has a vote but allowing floods of illegal (soon to be granted amnesty) immigrants; allowing large number of refugees to be brought to the this country on the say so of the POTUS, not the people...will create an “illegitimate”, liberal majority that will never be overcome by voting of the always-aging, ever-changing citizens in this country. That’s stacking the deck, or what I call, cheating.

Yes, the young contribute greatly to our country, just as the old have. I agree with you that we shouldn’t divide citizens into opposing groups (young vs. old) but it seems that is already happening whether we like it or not. Let’s not allow one group to permanently be in charge of all of us.


RS August 10, 2016, 9:23 pm Mr. Tom Lynch, You have had a long and distinguished life!! You must be getting tired!! The point of my response was to challenge Patty’s contention that young people should not be considered as valuable as older people in running the country. To prove her point, Patty stated that young people were not involved in making our country. I was pointing out that indeed the “Founding Fathers” included younger men to disprove her point.
Another point to ponder. It has always been the young who have fought and died, first to gain our independence and then for every military effort from then forward. So yes, I believe that young Americans have given quite a lot for our country. Often times giving more than the older men who send them off to war.
It is popular today to divide our citizens into categories; young/old, men/women, gay/straight, white/non-white, Christian/non-Christian. Fear of each other’s uniqueness only serves to divide us further.
TL August 10, 2016, 3:58 pm Rosemary,
As one of the youngest individuals who signed the constitution (chuckle), I can tell you that as I aged, I also accumulated wisdom, common sense and life experience.

Just because a young person has liberal ideas as an untested individual, does not mean that they will stick with those ideas as they get older. Older people tend to be conservative. Do you think all these old conservatives were born that way?

What kind of country will this be if half the citizens no longer have a voice in governing their country?
RS August 9, 2016, 2:27 pm Patty, Patty, Patty, Never let facts get in your way. Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 15 were in their 30\'s another 18 in their 40\'s. Thomas Jefferson was 33, Tom Lynch and Ed Rutledge were 26. James Madison was 25 when he helped to craft the Constitution, although he did not sign it. Betsy Ross was a just 25 during the Revolutionary War when she sewed the first US flag. John Adams and John Hancock were a bit older at age 40 and the oldest was Ben Franklin at age 70. In my book, those are pretty young people helping to establish our country.
I know it is tough for some to admit that they are getting older and that the younger generations will be taking over but no matter how much you worry about that, they will be taking over. Can\'t stop time.
PM August 8, 2016, 7:48 pm Hey what a great idea, let\'s turn the country over to the young people, after all a bunch of young people founded the country and made those tough decisions...and historically young people do that...not...
TH August 8, 2016, 3:36 pm Copy and paste much Bob? The Supreme court spiel has been all over social media over the past month. Trump\'s nominees are unlikely to lean to the right...much like Trump doesn\'t. The court is in need of a change. As old conservatives are replaced on the Supreme Court they should be replaced by more moderate or even liberals. The younger generations needs younger decision makers that will affect them. It\'s no coincidence that the younger generation is more liberal and accepting. We\'re finally doing away with traditions and laws that have held the country back for decades. Anyhow, my guess is that conservatives would prefer Hillary nominees over Trump nominees in a blind test.
BR August 6, 2016, 8:55 am If Trump wins and he is an ass as President, he\'ll be out in 4 years (or impeached, whichever comes first).

If Hillary wins you, your children, and grand children will live under Hillary\'s designated Supreme Court justices for many years to come

Justice Scalia\'s seat is vacant, and…Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is 79, Breyer is 77, Thomas is 67.

Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.

These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court.

If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation. And 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are viewed as lacking in mandate.

Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms.

If Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life