"If you torture numbers, they will tell you anything."

I do not know who first said this, but it applies to just about everything, from sports statistics to political polls. 

Today, the numbers I wish to torture concern global warming. (I refuse to let anyone get away with calling it "climate change," because the climate changes every day.)

As an Iowa native who is becoming less and less of a fan of winter, I keep hoping that global warming warnings are right. I would love for baseball weather to happen while Christmas bells are ringing. 

But alas, that virtually never happens in Iowa. 

But is it getting warmer, even in Iowa, in the winter?

I wanted to find out so I did some searching. 

By no means do I consider this any kind of final scientific verdict, but I have discovered a weather history web site that seems to have no political motives. That site lists high and low temperatures for each month of most years between 1942 and 2013.

What that Weather History site tells me is this: From 1942 to 1947, the mean (average) temperature in January in Iowa was 22.11 degrees. But from 2007 (which was one of the warmer in history) to 2013, the mean temperature was 21.35 degrees F.

So, along with the daily experience of wearing insulated gloves instead of baseball gloves, I can point to at least one web site that offers scientific documentation that global warming remains an unfulfilled promise. January weather in Iowa is more than one degree colder than it was during World War 2. 

The ironic thing is that I agree with many of the things global warming prophets say we should do. I support using every possible source of renewable energy, including bio-fuels, solar and wind. Economics and world instability have been warning us for years about oil and how our need for it complicates our national security, especially as it involves nations with crazy, anti-American leaders.

But if you want me to join your "global warming" chorus, you will have to wait until January brings more baseballs than snowballs.